Then, in August, talks between Weiss’s team and Hunter’s attorneys to finalize that deal collapsed. In July, Weiss’s team presented their plea deal with Hunter before a judge - who refused to accept it, telling both sides to clarify some of its provisions after a dramatic public hearing. In May, two IRS officials involved in the probe went to Congress as whistleblowers to argue that Weiss’s team wasn’t being aggressive enough. The Hunter Biden investigation has had about as messy a year as could be imagined. The question is why, exactly, that plea deal fell apart. ![]() They did so only after the lead prosecutor, David Weiss, shifted to a more aggressive posture after a plea deal he’d struck with Hunter’s team fell apart. Initially, prosecutors weren’t going to charge Hunter in the gun case at all. Prosecutors assert that this violated three different laws - two false statements laws, and one law banning firearm possession by a drug user.īut the legal and political saga surrounding the indictment is much more complicated. When Hunter bought the gun, he filled out a form saying he was not a drug user, when in fact he had a serious addiction at that time. ![]() The indictment is brief because the underlying situation is quite simple. The new indictment against Hunter Biden unsealed Thursday doesn’t have anything to do with all that - it’s about a gun Hunter bought in 2018. And congressional Republicans have been hoping to connect Hunter’s money to corrupt conduct from Joe Biden, though they haven’t succeeded in proving any such thing yet. ![]() For more than four years, prosecutors have been digging into Hunter Biden’s tax and business affairs - including millions of dollars he made from a Ukrainian gas company and a Chinese energy company.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |